🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. HMO. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. HDHP. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Not the typical entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Choosing the right healthcare insurance for our business – or for our families – seems like demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It's Expensive

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% compared to last year). Typical company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $17,000 for each worker in 2026, an increase of 9.5% from 2025.

Currently the government is shut down because political disagreements regarding tax credits that experts say will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're approaching that point because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an established insurance framework – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. How our healthcare providers receive payment changes. Believe me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would need payments from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making average wages pays about 5.3% to their healthcare. Their employer must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear expensive? Unless you contrast that with what the typical US resident spends. I know dozens of clients who are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. And keep in mind that in inclusive programs, those payments include retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and job loss protection along with supporting healthcare facilities. When you add these expenses compared with what we pay on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Implementation for America

In the US, universal healthcare funding would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both worker and company payments. And, like much of federal defense, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for entrepreneurs such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would render administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than going through the complex (and fruitless) process of negotiating with major insurers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer would be privy to workers' medical records for risk assessment and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. But I've learned that government play important functions in our lives, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire the majority of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to enjoy better health, have better attendance and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning effectively. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and more affordable approach both for managing medical expenses but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Maybe one bright spot in this present circumstances could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that big changes are necessary.